In the early 1990s, the Department of Education embarked on a project to develop a grouping of courses and classes in the career and technical education space which would make it easier for State to report to the department how many students were taking courses in different career areas.
These groupings go by many names, they were initially called vocations, then programs, pathways, and now they are referred to as 'career clusters.'
The Department of Education issued a call for proposal and selected an external group to conduct research and develop a model for the grouping of occupations and industries. The idea being, that similar classes result in similar occupations.
Unfortunately, there were winners and losers in that evaluation. Not every recognized industry, discipline, or occupation was selected to have its own grouping. And Family and Consumer Sciences was one of those losers. While it was long recognized as a vocation and was named in the federal legislation as a critical component of career and technical education, it was was excluded from the final collection of groupings.
But it still remained a part of career and technical education programs. Many States still maintain a Family and Consumer Sciences program, and to those States we are very thankful.
Other States chose to create their own groupings or to follow the model - both options included Family and Consumer Sciences but with the FCS courses split among different career pathways (or clusters). This ended up being a benefit and curse. It was a benefit because schools could hire a Family and Consumer Sciences educator and that educator could teach subjects in multiple career areas. Providing schools with more return on investment, many teachers can only teach one subject, but FCS teachers can teach many. But the lack of a defined "Family and Consumer Sciences" career pathway (or cluster) resulted in less students realizing they were taking family and consumer sciences and pursuing FCS degrees in college.
And these decreases in enrollment have led to employee gaps in education, communication, culinary arts, milling and baking, textile sciences, and more.
In 2022-2025, an ambitious project was launched to revise the groupings of careers into a modernized framework and AAFCS was there working with fellow FCS associations as part of the Alliance for FCS to advocacy for FCS to added back.
And below documents, letters, records, and research capture the work that AAFCS did in partnership with the Alliance to advocate for FCS to be included.
Unfortunately, external groups worked against FCS and the decision was made again to exclude FCS from this modernized framework of Career Clusters. But we hope that this will serve as a resource and historical record of the value of Family and Consumer Sciences and the need for the U.S. to change course and include FCS programs in all States.
And FCS will continue on in the many States that still offer FCS as a career pathway (or cluster) and include FCS classes within their other career pathways.